Performance Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks showing where KopioRapido excels across different hardware configurations

Mac Mini M4 SSD Performance

macOS · Apple M4 · 24GB
Internal NVMe SSD (APFS) → Internal NVMe SSD (APFS)

Medium Files (10x10MB)

8,404 MB/s throughput with parallel moderate strategy

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
0.012s
cp -r
cp -r
0.089s

Large File (50MB)

6,028 MB/s throughput using clonefile() API

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
0.008s
cp
cp
0.052s

Tiny Files (1000x10KB)

7,118 files/sec with optimized metadata handling

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
0.14s
cp -r
cp -r
1.85s

Windows Arm64 SSD to HDD

Windows · Snapdragon X Elite (Arm64) · 32GB
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe → Seagate Barracuda 4TB HDD

Large File (50GB Video)

Adaptive strategy selected async I/O with 16MB buffer

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
225s
RoboCopy
RoboCopy
642s

Small Files (50k Source Code)

Parallel strategy masked HDD seek latency

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
45s
RoboCopy
RoboCopy
375s

Instant Block Cloning (ReFS)

Windows · Intel Core i9-13900K · 64GB
ReFS Volume (NVMe) → ReFS Volume (NVMe)

Same-Volume Copy (50GB)

Leveraged FSCTL_DUPLICATE_EXTENTS_TO_FILE for zero-copy clone

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
0.8s
RoboCopy
RoboCopy
55.0s

Network Delta Sync

Linux · AMD Ryzen 9 7950X · 64GB
Local NVMe → SMB Share (1GbE)

Update 10GB File (100MB Changed)

FastRsyncNet calculated rolling checksums to send only diffs

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
4.2s
rsync
rsync
28.5s

macOS APFS Cloning

macOS · Apple M3 Max · 36GB
Internal SSD (APFS) → Internal SSD (APFS)

Project Folder Clone (15GB)

Used native clonefile() API

KopioRapido
KopioRapido
0.5s
cp -r
cp -r
12.0s

Notes: Benchmarks are run on specific hardware configurations. While native tools like cp and RoboCopy are competitive for raw local transfers, KopioRapido excels in hardware-aware scenarios like block cloning and delta updates.